Supermicro X9SRL-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRL-F
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.60GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 164
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 604
54% 458 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 21.6
13% 20.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20.8
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X100 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 225 228 222 227 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 236
Write 226
Mixed 158
SusWrite 226
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 23.2
78% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 115
98% 143 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 91%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33
234GB free
Firmware: 1S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 134 134 133 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 133
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 127 129 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 116
Write 127
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRL-F Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback