MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 09:37
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 726
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 76.8
46% 64.5 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 44.7
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 240GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 31 283 92 167 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 423
Write 420
Mixed 345
SusWrite 173
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 34.3
122% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 207
175% 251 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
518GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 154 168 146 169 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 161
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
362GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 131 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 147
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 132
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
573GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 54 53 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 41.8
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 53.3
38% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 63%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
265GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 117 109 118 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 115
68% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 36.6
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 33.1
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback