Biostar H61MHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 02:36
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 119
54% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 204
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 187 200 189 185 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 120
Write 149
Mixed 132
SusWrite 180
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 50.3
41% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
883GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 93 96 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 74
Write 98.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 94.3
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.6 5.6 4.8 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 22
Write 3.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 5.4
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MHV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback