Biostar H61MHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 00:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 322
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 208 210 212 210 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 151
Write 210
Mixed 175
SusWrite 210
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 48.6
40% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
642GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 81 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 82.2
Write 57.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 81.1
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MHV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback