Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Memory 28.3 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 41 20% 31.4 Pts	4-Core 61.5 8-Core 62.8 8% 62.2 Pts	64-Core 56.1 4% 56.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0865) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 5 Parallax 2.6 1% 3.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 3,975 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 122 84 66 59 66 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 250 Write 120 Mixed 202 SusWrite 104 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 14.5 54% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 111 85% 116 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GBHynixBench 43%, 20 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF2G64HZ-1G6A1 20GBHynixBench 33%, 6 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16