Alienware m15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAlienware m15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0N8F19
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 20:01
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 528
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 08A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.7
5% 14.8 fps
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.5
7% 7.75 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 800P SSDPEK1W120 118GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K411D03N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 450 505 477 487 476 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
211% Outstanding
Read 1092
Write 520
Mixed 740
SusWrite 474
157% 706 MB/s
4K Read 112
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 103
352% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 580
453% 631 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 211%
Great: 253%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
687GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 121 126 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 88.8
Write 24.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 122
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m15 Builds (Compare 658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback