ECS H61H2-CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H61H2-CM  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 87.1
51% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 132
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 204 82 73 73 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 185
Write 221
Mixed 185
SusWrite 120
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 26
98% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 152
125% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
261GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 110
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-CM Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback