Lenovo 20202

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20202  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130403
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 157
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 387
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3223
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 80 58 49 48 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 435
Write 374
Mixed 373
SusWrite 110
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 48.5
54% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
452GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 83.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 90
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 63%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 64GB
1GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 14 10 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 8.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 16
17% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
41% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20202 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback