HP 500-320nt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP 500-320nt  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory3.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 546
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 10.2
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 136 138 144 148 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 123
Write 142
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 135
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 114%
USBKey USBKeyCo., 0GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1
1% 0.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-320nt Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-320nt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback