Exper DIAMONDDEX599W

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Exper DIAMONDDEX599W (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191023
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 706 73% 585 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.1 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 1024G 1TB 1,315 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: T200121a SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 442 260 171 171 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 306 Mixed 274 SusWrite 277 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 43.2 160% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 298 210% 263 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 102%
USBKey USBKeyCo., 0GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Read 0.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 0.4 0% 0.25 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 4%
ASMT 2115 320GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 185GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 85 85 86 85 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 80.3 Write 8.7 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 72.5 68% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 41%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 35GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 18 Write 14 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 11 15% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 0702 16GB 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.5% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 21.5 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 24.6 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DIAMONDDEX599W Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Exper DIAMONDDEX599W

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	1x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	3x
1024G 1TBHs-ssd-e100Bench 81%, 1,315 samples	1x

RAM
DDR4 3000 04CB DDR4 3200 16GBUnknownBench 73%, 94 samples	2x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	1x
DDR4 3000 0702 16GBUnknownBench 77%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $96

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16