Gateway DX6795

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway DX6795  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DX6795
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 10:21
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 138
53% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 580
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67% Good
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 74.2
68% 78.4 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 67.7
64% 80.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00007 1TB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 986 911 849 815 765 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 1,420
Mixed 1,489
SusWrite 870
342% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 72.2
230% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 625
470% 630 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 248%
Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC8T1-BXRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX6795 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Gateway DX6795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback