ASRock Z170 GAMING K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardASRock Z170 GAMING K6  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150730
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 21:03
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$219
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 484
57% 441 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 204
Parallax 159
178% 194 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 225
Splatting 169
174% 220 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 895 1057 1154 1172 1239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,953
Write 1438
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 1065
333% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 35.7
136% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 159
205% 393 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 207%
Great: 488%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 118 111 111 133 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 52
Write 69.9
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 115
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 110%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 128 130 128 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 164
Write 139
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 131
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 157 167 157 157 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 62
SusWrite 159
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
913GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 146 138 137 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 162
Write 153
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 139
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 0215 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 0215 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: ASRock Z170 GAMING K6 - $267

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $754
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback