Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 648
60% 500 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1659 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 68.3
52% 71 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 61.9
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 461
Mixed 402
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 43.9
158% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 95.7
DQ Mixed 138
108% 152 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
47GB free
Firmware: V56OA7EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.8
Write 43.3
Mixed 26
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 40%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
212GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.3
Write 59.3
Mixed 24.8
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: 02.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 45.8
Write 46.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 46.9
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 TPVT-00U4RT1 1TB
40GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 54
Write 50.5
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 53.9
64% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 640GB
8GB free, PID 60c4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 40 45 40 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 14
Mixed 29
SusWrite 42.3
40% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback