Zotac ZBOX-MI/CI625/645/665NANO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemZotac ZBOX-MI/CI625/645/665NANO  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC ZBOX-MI/CI625/645/665NANO
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 312
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 695
78% 612 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Zotac(19DA B448) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 29.7
20% 27.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 438 422 434 212 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 449
Mixed 421
SusWrite 351
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 42.8
150% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 176
140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 99%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 2096
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.3
7% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
43% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 14.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBOX-MI/CI625/645/665NANO Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac ZBOX-MI/CI625/645/665NANO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback