Lenovo 20SUS5W200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20SUS5W200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20SUS5W200
Memory48 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211108
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 02:31
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 226
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 710
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
Legend(17AA 22B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 513.29
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 83.5
70% 88 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 79
Splatting 87.4
78% 96.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1418 1360 1369 1346 1374 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1986
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,508
SusWrite 1,395
396% 1,761 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 62.5
198% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 1,369
DQ Mixed 1,164
888% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 280%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 29.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20SUS5W200 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 20SUS5W200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback