Lenovo 20NES11J00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20NES11J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NES11J00
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 21:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 198
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 476
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.12.03
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 16.4
10% 13.4 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 838 402 411 411 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 1,492
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 575
263% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 52.8
188% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 634
486% 665 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 177%
Great: 218%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
867GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 35 36 40 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 3.2
Write 39.2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 36.9
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
47% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NES11J00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NES11J00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback