Lenovo 20NES11J00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20NES11J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NES11J00
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 188
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 505
48% 400 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 17.5
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 15
Splatting 11.9
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1074 924 407 413 412 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 1,508
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 607
278% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.5
214% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 669
515% 708 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 196%
Great: 218%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
660GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 130
Write 109
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NES11J00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NES11J00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback