Acer Aspire V3-575TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-575TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Usopp_SL
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 133
53% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 222
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Acer(1025 1031) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.1
11% 11.7 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.2
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 207 222 230 233 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 448
Write 238
Mixed 155
SusWrite 220
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 22.7
104% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 54.9
103% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-575TG Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-575TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback