RM ONE 300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemRM ONE 300  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 17:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 78
2-Core 143
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 310
34% 266 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
EVGA(3842 3743) 1GB
CLim: 1084 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 12.7
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 75 74 74 78 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40% Average
Read 134
Write 96.2
Mixed 103
SusWrite 76.2
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 23
81% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 95
75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE 300 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback