Lenovo 20EN0007MS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EN0007MS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EN0007MS
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 15:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 166
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 436
48% 377 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 2230) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.8
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 328 340 343 294 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 403
Write 359
Mixed 341
SusWrite 300
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 20.4
61% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 84.8
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 129
112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
348GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 71
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 73.8
89% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.3
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EN0007MS Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EN0007MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback