Pcware APM-A320G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware APM-A320G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APM-A320G
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 22:53
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 85
39% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 94.6
8-Core 97
13% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 78.7
5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXBOMSSD-25SA120G 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 298 345 330 359 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 397
Write 336
Mixed 208
SusWrite 323
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 16.8
92% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 110
98% 146 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
392GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 125 123 127 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 122
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 WA5SD8G8C3UAZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APM-A320G Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware APM-A320G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback