Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory0.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 140
56% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 304A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 202 216 218 213 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42% Average
Read 204
Write 203
Mixed 138
SusWrite 202
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 14.8
51% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 116
92% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 4GB
0GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.9
Write 13.9
Mixed 13
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:00 00 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback