Performance Results


Gaming 139% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220427
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 260 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 865 83% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,100 68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Lighting 236 Reflection 220 Parallax 211 193% 222 fps	MRender 205 Gravity 161 Splatting 142 135% 169 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GJDM820 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: H8FN70.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 178 95 102 141 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 475 Write 206 Mixed 234 SusWrite 166 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 22.4 101% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 146 138% 215 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 77%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 424GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 441 432 447 408 434 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 454 Mixed 432 SusWrite 430 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 98.7 4K Mixed 54.2 181% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 216 163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 128%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 631GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 1446 1422 1480 1335 1423 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 1,533 Write 1,510 Mixed 1,116 SusWrite 1409 313% 1,392 MB/s	4K Read 63 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 86.4 309% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 950 DQ Mixed 274 359% 636 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB 2,825 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 36 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 35.9 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 35.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16