Exper ACTIVE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemExper ACTIVE  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3210-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 95.1
53% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 79.3
8-Core 91.3
11% 85.3 Pts
64-Core 94.1
6% 94.1 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 47 43 48 45 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 37.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 45.2
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905403-081.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACTIVE Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback