Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory11.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 23:59
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 69.1
46% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 160
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 10.5
9% 10.3 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 9.27
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.76 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 50.5
Mixed 18
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.21
44% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 80AD HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 80AD HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 14GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback