Acer Aspire V5-122P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-122P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V5-122P
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140120
Uptime13 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 14:38
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-1450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 39.9
1-Core 19.3
2-Core 32.3
21% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 53.9
8-Core 54
7% 54 Pts
64-Core 53.3
3% 53.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 61 81 94 77 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 209
Write 138
Mixed 170
SusWrite 70.4
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 14.4
56% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 103
76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 73%
Truenas iSCSI Disk 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 11 15 9.7 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 52.9
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 13.8
24% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 6.6
1,101% 6.4 MB/s
Truenas iSCSI Disk 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 14 11 15 12 9.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 47.9
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 13.8
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 6
1,074% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS Elpida 6GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-122P Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-122P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback