TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P10S-M WS Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 10 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus P10S-M WS Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P10S-M WS Series
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 472
64% 475 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 217
Parallax 210
190% 220 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 158
Splatting 140
134% 167 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 157%
 Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 1TB SATA SSD 1TB
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 364 426 435 255 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 480
Write 423
Mixed 425
SusWrite 288
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 29.3
133% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 46.3
90% 174 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 87.3%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 70.9%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P10S-M WS Series Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus P10S-M WS Series

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples25x
Xeon E3-1270 v5IntelBench 78%, 1,290 samples4x
Xeon E3-1245 v6IntelBench 82%, 562 samples4x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples5x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples4x
SSD
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples3x
SSDPEKKW010T8 1TBIntelBench 248%, 3,058 samples3x
RAM
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 5,199 samples18x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples3x
M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 73%, 178 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback