Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 65 2-Core 127 57% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 244 33% 246 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 4015) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kazuk 120GB 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 34 38 11 25 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.5% Below average	Read 207 Write 218 Mixed 175 SusWrite 31.3 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 9.3 57% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 17.2 43% 89 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 387GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 126 121 128 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 125 Write 123 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 126 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 444GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 25.4 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 27.4 35% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 50GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16