CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCDM CS-B/CDM/SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CS-B/CDM/SI
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 330
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 62.2
51% 64.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 54
49% 61 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 366
Mixed 135
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 19
40% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 118
70% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
111GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 65.2
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 90.2
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB
244GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 95 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 80.4
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 96
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B/CDM/SI Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback