Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 289%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 69.1
1-Core 208
2-Core 424
118% 234 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,692
150% 1,272 Pts
64-Core 3,044
188% 3,044 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 305
Reflection 278
Parallax 311
249% 298 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 254
Splatting 184
206% 262 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 208%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
758GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2330 2419 2440 2484 2175 765 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,676
Write 2,528
Mixed 2,442
SusWrite 2,102
549% 2,437 MB/s
4K Read 85.3
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 125
415% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,176
DQ Write 1,760
DQ Mixed 1,959
1,469% 1,965 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 452%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,643
Write 2,250
Mixed 1,627
482% 2,174 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 112
396% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 1,669
DQ Mixed 1,166
932% 1,281 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
888GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3687 3716 3707 3665 3611 3572 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
537% Outstanding
Read 3562
Write 3,702
Mixed 2418
SusWrite 3,660
752% 3,336 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 74
252% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,876
DQ Write 2,345
DQ Mixed 2,079
1,577% 2,100 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 537%
Great: 623%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
652GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 154 176 178 178 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 157
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 175
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 552C40-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3876 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 48.4
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME Builds (Compare 680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback