Acer Veriton EN2580

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton EN2580  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton EN2580(TGL)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 16:56
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 191
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 401
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1518) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 19.7
8% 16.7 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 4.7
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 204 173 161 157 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,341
Write 913
Mixed 1,004
SusWrite 190
192% 862 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 59.7
201% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 393
323% 468 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 150%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 19.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 15.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton EN2580 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton EN2580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback