ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FX506IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FX506IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220426
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '22 at 03:37
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 26,507 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 70.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 562 8-Core 961 92% 762 Pts	64-Core 1356 84% 1356 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 16CF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.4% Good	Lighting 80.3 Reflection 114 Parallax 70.4 65% 88.3 fps	MRender 94.1 Gravity 78.2 Splatting 71.3 65% 81.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,469 Write 906 Mixed 967 246% 1,114 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 67.5 237% 87.9 MB/s	DQ Read 684 DQ Write 490 DQ Mixed 575 433% 583 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 189%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 481GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 97 100 101 98 102 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 128 Write 107 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 99.9 71% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.6 229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 79%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 459GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 32.9 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 35 44% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK01 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 72GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	Read 37.9 Write 36.8 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 4.5 37% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 11.3 879% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 10.7 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 12 948% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 20.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FX506IU Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FX506IU

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	174x
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	7x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	91x
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	91x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	34x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	30x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	30x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	34x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	33x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GBMicronBench 46%, 6,167 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback