Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 03:33
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 256
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 656
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 30
Parallax 27.4
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 20.8
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 48
24% 36 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 46
Splatting 47.6
36% 44 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1195 1059 1237 1252 1239 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1280
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,208
SusWrite 1,194
284% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 56.3
198% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 813
564% 718 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 215%
Great: 289%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
54GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 35.4
Write 34.1
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 40.1
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 61%
WDC WD10 EZRZ-00HTKB0 1TB
474GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 7 7.1 7.1 7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.8% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7
9% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 10.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback