Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 02:35
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 195
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 655
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 209
Parallax 225
186% 221 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 155
Splatting 136
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 336
Mixed 379
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 46.5
159% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Qgeem QGEEM 480GB
33GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 203 208 181 185 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 358
Write 250
Mixed 258
SusWrite 213
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 7.5
45% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 34.7
41% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 63%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
31GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,478
Write 1,875
Mixed 1,773
453% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 71.7
232% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 710
514% 675 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback