Lenovo 20M90024US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20M90024US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M90024US
Memory40.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 509
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.6% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 112
96% 106 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 100
Splatting 90.6
87% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 793 549 552 540 534 528 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,146
Write 1,792
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 583
322% 1,446 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 62.4
208% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 824
632% 859 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 225%
Great: 296%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
217GB free
Firmware: 5L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1193 635 636 635 615 635 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,150
Write 1530
Mixed 1,271
SusWrite 725
316% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 64.7
205% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1011
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 868
667% 910 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 236%
Great: 296%
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
66GB free
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 488 486 364 204 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 674
Write 444
Mixed 516
SusWrite 366
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 495
409% 596 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 132%
Great: 172%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 161 158 161 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 137
Write 149
Mixed 68
SusWrite 156
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84%
Great: 95%
asmedia ASM1153 1TB
743GB free, PID fdc0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 165 166 163 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.3% Good
Read 164
Write 159
Mixed 83
SusWrite 164
191% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G M471A2K43CB1-CRC 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M90024US Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 20M90024US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback