Communication CT-EM140-IB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemCommunication CT-EM140-IB  (all builds)
MotherboardCommunication CT-EM140-IB
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 13:03
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 139
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 203
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2111) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 3
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSH-256 253GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P083 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 300
Write 131
Mixed 177
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 2.86
46% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 15.5
40% 83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 61%
WDC WD10 JUCT-63CYNY0 1TB
811GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
Read 94.8
Write 99.6
Mixed 58.5
106% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.91 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback