O.e.m Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardO.e.m Intel H81  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 237
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 041E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3540
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 4.1
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 221 220 237 123 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 257
Write 218
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 186
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 11.9
64% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 23.8
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel H81 Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: O.e.m Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback