Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault PE3950-ME-EN-V01
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 08:03
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3950
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Memory 28.8
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 74.4
26% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 145
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 5A84) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 64GB SSD 64GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 208 212 108 62 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 368
Write 259
Mixed 252
SusWrite 147
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 13.2
79% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 36
61% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback