MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 06:26
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 272
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1,063
95% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,854
115% 1,854 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
87% 108 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1260 1258 1257 1253 1217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,896
Write 1,711
Mixed 756
SusWrite 1277
315% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 73.4
273% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 417
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 423
415% 637 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 271%
Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
512GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 1153 1151 1159 1153 1156 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,667
Write 1477
Mixed 772
SusWrite 1,178
285% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 45.8
188% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 1,148
DQ Mixed 802
672% 964 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 242%
Great: 302%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
943GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2461 2461 2468 1709 1621 1072 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 1799
Write 1,679
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 1,965
406% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 108
388% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,273
953% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 368%
Great: 431%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 121 123 122 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 106
Mixed 74
SusWrite 121
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 159 159 161 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
2TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 166 166 168 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
1TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 103 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43% Average
Read 47.8
Write 82.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 101
102% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 19.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $959
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback