MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A95
Motherboard	MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95) (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20200601
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '22 at 13:54
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900X 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 81.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 271 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 1,060 95% 802 Pts	64-Core 1,865 115% 1,865 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 87% 108 fps	MRender 96.2 Gravity 104 Splatting 99.5 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 791GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1392 1254 1253 1255 1254 1164 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,889 Write 1,722 Mixed 776 SusWrite 1262 316% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 216 4K Mixed 57.8 254% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 1,142 DQ Mixed 406 407% 626 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 514GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1002 1007 1003 1003 1001 1003 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 951 Write 996 Mixed 724 SusWrite 1,003 207% 919 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 19 58% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,088 DQ Write 1,239 DQ Mixed 658 635% 995 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 302%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 943GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2465 2460 2470 1705 1463 1479 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	404% Outstanding	Read 2,574 Write 2,415 Mixed 1992 SusWrite 2,007 505% 2,247 MB/s	4K Read 73.7 4K Write 260 4K Mixed 108 387% 147 MB/s	DQ Read 1,458 DQ Write 1,222 DQ Mixed 1,318 994% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 404% Great: 431%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 121 121 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 121 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 158 159 162 159 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 97.5 Write 143 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 158 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.7 243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 90%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170 104 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: AV01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 167 166 167 162 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 103 101 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 47.8 Write 83.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 101 103% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB 10,048 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.4% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 17.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 11.2 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	55x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	53x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	40x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	24x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	19x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	18x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	69x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	29x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $953

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16