Dell OptiPlex 790

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 790
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 790  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 06:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 132
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 188
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 104 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 220
Write 128
Mixed 175
SusWrite 105
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 26.6
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 116
98% 145 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 110%
Emtec X200 256GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.01% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 21.6
Mixed 22
SusWrite 14.6
5% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 5.1
20% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 71%
WD WD7501AAES-60Z2A0 750GB
436GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 102 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 90.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 102
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate Portable 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 20.9
Write 20.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 14.2
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 830B NT4GC64B88B1NF-DI KHX1600C9D3/4GX 830B NT4GC64B88B1NF-DI 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 790 Builds (Compare 5,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 790

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback