Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 179 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 384 51% 384 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0F00) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 1.4 4% 3.97 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB 4,398 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 231 231 231 231 230 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.2% Average	Read 235 Write 9.7 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 221 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 11.3 74% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 26.5 36% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	30x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
Radeon R5 240AMDBench 5%, 4,978 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
Series SATA SSD 240GBVBench 70%, 4,398 samples	5x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 54%, 1,969 samples	4x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	4x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $88