Positivo POS-EIH55HBM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPositivo POS-EIH55HBM  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH55HBM
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 13:58
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 135
55% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 187
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.7
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 89 90 92 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 110
Mixed 52
SusWrite 93.4
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160813AS 160GB-$139
95GB free
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 91 93 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 94.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 93.9
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 12.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EIH55HBM Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH55HBM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback