Metabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMetabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH50_70RH
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 12:33
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 794
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 8552) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 38.6
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 26.1
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 80 32 27 31 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 915
Mixed 864
SusWrite 89.1
182% 822 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 71
253% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 342
329% 500 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 166%
Great: 209%
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 388 397 398 402 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 494
Write 395
Mixed 356
SusWrite 401
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 22.5
103% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 39.3
80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 99%
Acer FA100 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.0.0.M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2179 1851 1786 1812 1943 2256 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 2,302
Mixed 1,589
SusWrite 1,971
411% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 0.9
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 36.9
32% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 215%
Great: 345%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 25.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 29.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Alpha-X NH70RHQ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Metabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback