Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 503
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K2AOAD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 26 36 41 47 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 55.4
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 38.6
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 01BA 01BA 01BA 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback