Medion MD35162

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive7.16% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35162  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B560H6-EM2
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 04:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$119
U3E1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 271
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 506
62% 474 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Zotac(19DA 9630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 121
Parallax 126
111% 128 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.4
89% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX0202AL 512GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L005 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 40 84 109 22 361 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.16% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 7.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 111
9% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 206%
hp x755w 124GB
41GB free, PID 3e07
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 5.3 11 7.9 10 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 26.8
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 7.3
20% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35162 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Medion MD35162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback