Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 16:32
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 285
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 1,010
88% 748 Pts
64-Core 1495
92% 1495 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 110
Parallax 124
101% 119 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 113
Splatting 102
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 784 765 763 765 754 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 2,466
Mixed 1,829
SusWrite 794
432% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 89.2
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 1,040
772% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 293%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
728GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1801 1817 1622 1484 1513 1511 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 1,808
Mixed 1,679
SusWrite 1,625
427% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 85.8
281% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,074
815% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 337%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 153 155 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 140
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 153
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST3500630NS 39M4517 42D0002IBM 500GB
77GB free
Firmware: 3.AEP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 54
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 73.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3500630NS 39M4517 42D0002IBM 500GB
116GB free
Firmware: 3.AEP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 43.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 58.2
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 160 162 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 155
Write 158
Mixed 123
SusWrite 161
204% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 25.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570S AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,016
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback