XMG PA70Hx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemXMG PA70Hx  (all builds)
MotherboardXMG PA70Hx
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 15:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 494
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 67B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 5.9
4% 27.9 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF256G8H 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHFH03N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 254 215 227 200 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 324
Write 292
Mixed 350
SusWrite 230
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 42.3
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 252
208% 296 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 106%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
184GB free
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 169 147 141 125 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 349
Write 204
Mixed 204
SusWrite 167
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 14
58% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 44.6
50% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PA70Hx Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: XMG PA70Hx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback