TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 15:39
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 479
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 16.4
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 8.19%
 Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11L 512GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s91
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 824 832 880 330 446 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 726
Mixed 836
SusWrite 669
197% 884 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 31.5
121% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 179
166% 256 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 143%
 Great: 239%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 108 106 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 129
Write 111
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 107
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 67.7%
 Great: 79%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 500GB
398GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 101 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 98.4
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 99.9
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 55%
 Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PJ16TFK1GM8 SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples219x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples169x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples111x
GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples219x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples211x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples111x
SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples161x
OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GBKingstonBench 119%, 4,645 samples60x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples52x
RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GBMicronBench 35%, 7,475 samples57x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples55x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples45x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback