soyo SY-H81N FS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboardsoyo SY-H81N FS  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 175
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 343
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 9.3
8% 11 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
119GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 79.4
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 58
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 119 116 113 106 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 131
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 114
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SY-H81N FS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: soyo SY-H81N FS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback